industrial policy

  • |

    Vote No, Take the Bow: CHIPS Hypocrisy in an X vs Checkmark

    ByMike Rotch

    I swear paperwork has teeth—because the CHIPS & Science Act crowd pulls the classic red-X-to-green-checkmark routine: “THEY VOTED NO,” then “THEN CHEERED THE MONEY,” then “TOOK THE BOW.” It’s like they’re running opposition as a drive-thru moral performance—order the “no subsidies” vibes, refuse the bill on principle, and immediately accept the investment like it’s a pizza they definitely didn’t mean to crave.

    And the best part is the “CHIPS for AMERICA” billboard energy: the same folks who wanted to stand on “vote no” posture now want credit for “cheered the CHIPS investments in their states.” That’s not industrial policy—that’s manufacturing a permission slip for donor-class optics, signed in triplicate, stamped with hometown pride, and delivered right on schedule. Committee-chair flop sweat? Nah. Camera-ready bow.

  • |

    America First, Invoice Later

    ByJustin Jest

    America First industrial policy is supposed to arrive wearing a hard hat and humming the national anthem, not dragging a grant folder with international forwarding labels and a tariff question mark stapled to its forehead. The sales pitch is clean: jobs, metal, sparks, greatness. Then the paperwork coughs, the ownership footnotes start doing parkour, and suddenly sovereignty looks like a lobbyist-built escape room with a flag rental.

    Taxpayers are told to clap for the furnace while the real heat stays in the fine print, where every billionaire-branded factory miracle becomes “economic development” if you squint through enough steam. If nobody can quickly say who owns it, who pays, and who benefits, maybe the smelter is not refining aluminum first. Maybe it is refining public trust into campaign confetti.

End of content

End of content