Resistance Rising, Says Axios: The Swamp Discovers It Has a Spine Again
United States – February 18, 2026 – Axios says resistance to Trump is growing as courts, markets, and a few Republicans push back on tariffs and crackdowns.
You can smell it in the air like lighter fluid on a windy day. The same town that once acted like President Trump was a weather system nobody could predict is suddenly rediscovering the ancient D.C. tradition of saying: actually, no. Axios calls it resistance rising. I call it the Swamp doing jazz hands and pretending it just found the Constitution under a stack of lobbyist receipts.
Axios: Institutions and a few Republicans are starting to push back on Trump
Axios reported on Feb. 13 that a subtle shift is unfolding: institutions and a small but growing number of Republicans are standing up to President Trump, even as Trump remains the dominant force in U.S. politics. The column argues that as some policies and tactics become unpopular or legally vulnerable, it gets easier for skittish Republicans and entrenched institutions to stop automatically saluting. Axios included a White House response from press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisting Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party.
Now, let me translate that from newsroom language into garage language. When the machine is running hot, even the guys who swore the engine was perfect start checking the temperature gauge. Not because they love you, but because they love not getting blamed when the hood starts smoking.
The pushback Axios points to: courts, Congress, and the bureaucracy saying ‘not so fast’
A grand jury turns away charges against six Democratic lawmakers
Axios points to a notable legal rebuke: a federal grand jury unanimously declined the Justice Department effort to indict six Democratic lawmakers over a video public service announcement urging service members to refuse unlawful orders. Reporting elsewhere identifies the lawmakers as Sen. Elissa Slotkin, Sen. Mark Kelly, and Reps. Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan. Details about the specific charges sought by prosecutors are not consistently clear across accessible reporting, but the key outcome is: the grand jury did not indict them.
Axios also says a federal judge shut down Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s attempt to punish Sen. Mark Kelly over his role in the video, calling it unconstitutional retaliation. That is the kind of sentence that makes every HR department in Washington start sweating through their linen suits.
ICE surge in Minneapolis scaled back after unrest and fatal shootings
Axios also highlighted immigration enforcement blowback. It cites Trump border czar Tom Homan announcing an end to the 10-week ICE surge in Minneapolis after two U.S. citizens were fatally shot, a period that triggered mass protests and rare corporate criticism. Other reporting described a significant reduction in agents and officers, with Homan saying 700 ICE and CBP personnel would leave the area. The exact operational details and who made what decision when are still described differently depending on the outlet, but the direction is consistent: the Minneapolis surge was scaled back.
Then comes the political part Axios flagged: Trump publicly acknowledged his mass deportation campaign could use a ‘softer touch,’ as polling showed a decline in support for his immigration policies. You do not hear that kind of phrase unless the political dashboard lights are flashing. Presidents do not pivot because activists whined. They pivot because the numbers moved.
National Guard withdrawal after legal defeats
Axios says Trump withdrew all federalized National Guard troops from Los Angeles, Chicago and Portland after repeated legal defeats and opposition from state and local leaders. The Washington Post reported the withdrawal occurred quietly and followed legal challenges, with thousands of troops previously deployed under federal authority and significant costs attached. However you feel about the deployment, the important point for this story is that the pullback happened, and Axios frames it as another example of friction catching up with a White House that has been pushing hard.
A House vote rebukes Trump tariffs on Canada
Congress provided the most concrete political headline in Axios’ list. On Feb. 11, the House passed a resolution to rescind Trump’s tariffs on Canada, 219-211. Six House Republicans voted with Democrats: Don Bacon, Kevin Kiley, Thomas Massie, Jeff Hurd, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Dan Newhouse. Reporting described the measure as largely symbolic, since it could face a Senate hurdle and a presidential veto, but symbolic is still a word you use right before you say: the vibes have changed.
Axios noted the vote became possible only after a smaller group of Republicans staged a floor rebellion against GOP leadership, allowing Democrats to force more votes on Trump’s trade agenda. If you have ever watched a tailgate turn into a shouting match, you understand the dynamic. It starts with one guy saying the brisket is dry. Next thing you know, half the family is taking sides and the dog is hiding under the truck.
Who benefits from ‘resistance rising’?
Axios is not saying Trump is suddenly powerless. It is saying the automatic deference is eroding. And that is important because the beneficiaries are not some heroic band of liberty-loving dissidents. The beneficiaries are often the same permanent institutions that love any excuse to reclaim leverage: corporate interests that hate uncertainty, lawmakers who want distance from unpopular moves, and bureaucracies that like to remind elected officials that paperwork is forever.
Even the tariff vote, while a policy argument about Canada, is also an internal Republican argument about who sets the agenda: the president or the congressional leadership, and how much pain members are willing to absorb for party unity. The answer, according to those six votes, is: not unlimited pain, not when the next election is closer than the next cable hit.
What it means for Trump, and for Republicans who keep saying ‘united’
Karoline Leavitt told Axios that Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party. That statement is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If leadership was unquestioned, nobody would need to declare it like a pastor swearing the choir is totally unified right after the drummer quit.
Axios’ bottom line is the real tell: Trump remains dominant, but the reflexive compliance that defined his first year is weakening. The big story here is not a single vote or a single withdrawal. It is the emerging pattern of institutions testing boundaries, and a few Republicans deciding that survival sometimes means developing a personality.
Here is my closing sermon, smoked low and slow: when the establishment starts chanting about norms, it is not because they found Jesus. It is because they found an opening. Trump built a political movement that runs like a supercharged V8. But even a V8 needs oil, and the people who change the oil in Washington would love to charge you triple and tell you the noise you hear is normal. Resistance rising might sound noble. It might even produce some real checks. But it is also the Swamp reminding everybody it never really left, it just changed hats.